A Structure for Evaluating Management Losses from Tpm Perspective Composition

A Framework intended for Assessing Management Losses by TPM

Perspective

Farhana Afreen Proma, Tahera Yesmin, and M. Ahsan Akhtar Hasin Dept. of business and Production Engineering,

Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology, Dhaka- 1000, Bangladesh Abstract

The definition of " Management Loss”, coming from Total Effective Maintenance or perhaps TPM point of view, means the productivity failures in an business due to holdups hindrances impediments or impedances caused by individual. These include 4 kinds of loss: losses because of awaiting materials, awaiting dolly, awaiting restoration and awaiting cleaning. TPM aims to minimize these loss through the right maintenance strategies. Therefore it is very important to get a right view of these losses. Although human deficits are often taken as qualitative failures and their results are not measured. This analyze, conducted in an eminent pharmaceutical industry of Bangladesh, reveals a structured technique of quantifying the management loss under TPM. A way of evaluating and contrasting the effects of delays was established. Keywords

Awaiting cleaning, Awaiting dolly, Awaiting material, Awaiting fix, Total Successful Maintenance (TPM), Management reduction.

1 . Launch

Total Productive Maintenance or TPM could be proven to be a very effective tool pertaining to the improvement of productivity, productivity of staff and equipments and the total environment of a company. The prime concern of TPM is more useful maintenance managing, which can be done through efficient teamwork [1]. That is why, mistakes and impedances due to man errors are to be minimized or nullified to get effective TPM implementation. One of many eight pillars of TPM, Kaizen (the third pillar), pursues successful equipment, agent, and materials and energy utilization. To accomplish these goals, 16 main losses have been completely identified to exist in an organization, of which 5 major losses are those who hinder individual work performance [2]. Among these types of, the first one is definitely " Supervision Loss”, which is basically the lost productive time due to expecting materials, companies, repair or cleaning. Typically, inefficient managing is responsible for this type of losses. This study required an insight into these 4 kinds of administration losses.

A highly reputed pharmaceutical company of Bangladesh currently practicing GMP (Good Manufacturing Practice) experienced taken affinity for implementing Total Productive Protection in their factory. One of the excellent mottos in the company was monitoring of processes pertaining to optimization of manufacturing time without compromising on quality. To achieve these goals and apply TPM properly, it was very important to figure out the delays and impedances at the same time flow happening due to human being errors. The four kinds of management losses were tested and their effects were in comparison in this research. The study [3] was executed in the tablet section of the pharmaceutical market. 2 . Books Review

Venkatesh [2] determined sixteen significant losses underneath TPM, of which five were attributed to man productivity losses. Among these five loss, the first one was termed " Management Loss”, which arises due to looking forward to something. Several practical research on TPM have been carried out, especially in employing TPM. Experts have come plan frameworks and roadmaps of implementing TPM in different industrial sectors, most of which in turn inevitably stress on skill development of labor force. Hussein Naguib [4] recommended a plan for TPM implementation in semiconductor industries, in which labor force and office development was equally underlined. Operators' skill development was mandatory for autonomous repair. Yoon Seng and Big t. Ramayah [5] proposed a procedure oriented strategy in applying TPM in a Malaysian industry, in which identity of losses and causes was vitally important. The reliability of any TPM integrated system have been taken as percentage of organized production amount of time in a technological report simply by Pekka Katila [6]. Mckone, Schroeder and Cua [7] conducted a study in 97...

Sources: 1 . Hasin, A. A., 2007, Top quality Control and Management, first Edition, Bangladesh Business Solutions, Dhaka.

installment payments on your Venkatesh, J., 2007, An Introduction to Total Effective Maintenance, The rose Maintenance Source

Center.

3. Proma, Farreneheit. A. and Yesmin, T., 2007, " Measurement of Human Failures and Risk Assessment: Case study of a

Pharmaceutical drug Company”, M. Sc Architectural Thesis, Office of Industrial and Production

some. Naguib, They would., " A Roadmap to get the Rendering of Total Productive Protection (TPM) within a

Semiconductor Production Operations”, 1993, Proceedings of IEEE/ SEMI International

your five. Seng, Um. Y., Jantan, M., and Ramayah, Big t., 2005, " Implementing total productive routine service (TPM) in

Malaysian manufacturing organization: A great operational strategy study”, The ICFAI Record of Businesses

6. Katila, P., 2000, Applying Total Productive Maintenance- TPM Concepts in the versatile Manufacturing

Systems, Technical Statement, Lulea University of Technology.

7. McKone, K. Electronic., Schroeder, R. G. and Cua, E. O., 99, " Total productive protection: a contextual view”,

Journal of Procedures Management, Volume

8. Bamber, C. M., Sharp, M. M. and Hides, M. T., 99, " Factors affecting successful implementation of total

fruitful maintenance: A UK production case study perspective”, Journal of Quality in Maintenance

Case Study: Stanley Australia Essay